Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts

Monday, August 10, 2026

Newly approved Attorney General wants to stop mail shipments of abortion inducing pills

 

Blanche signals potential restrictions on mifepristone by mail from Trump administration


Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche attends a news conference at the Justice Department in Washington Aug. 5, 2026. Blanche signaled on a July private call with a predominantly Protestant Christian ministry that the Trump administration would be "putting practices and policies in place" to stop shipment of mifepristone by mail. (OSV News photo/Jonathan Ernst, Reuters)

WASHINGTON (OSV News) — Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche signaled on a call with a predominantly Protestant Christian ministry that the Trump administration would be “putting practices and policies in place” to stop shipment of mifepristone by mail. 

During a private call-in late July, hosted by the White House Faith Office, Blanche told the group Intercessors for America that the Justice Department was “working hand in hand” with federal agencies and the White House “so that the Dobbs decision becomes permanent in every single state.” He referred to Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision finding abortion a constitutionally protected right and returned the matter of restricting or regulating abortion to the legislative branch. A recording of the Blanche call, which appears to have since been removed from YouTube, was first reported by Politico.

“If states have said, ‘We are going to protect the unborn and we’re going to protect every life from the moment of conception,’ we’re putting practices and policies in place so that other states and other organizations can’t attack that,” Blanche said on the call. “They can’t do things like they’re doing with mailing in mail-order drugs.”

A spokesperson for the Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment from OSV News. 

Justice Department says Blanche remarks need to be understood in context

But a Justice Department statement provided to The Hill claimed Blanche’s “comments have been mischaracterized and need to be understood in their full context, which was with respect to mail order abortion drugs, not a broader expansion of federal control over states.”

The Trump administration asked multiple judges to pause state lawsuits seeking to roll back Biden administration-era eased restrictions on mifepristone, a drug commonly used for first trimester abortion, but which is also used in some miscarriage care protocols. The Trump administration has thus far left that regulation in effect while seeking to block challenges to it pending a promised FDA safety review, prompting frustration from pro-life advocates.

The state lawsuits — notably from Louisiana, Missouri and Florida — seek to end the FDA policy implemented during the Biden administration permitting mifepristone to be distributed by mail. The states have argued the policy undermines their own state laws, among other objections.

In April, a federal judge agreed to the Justice Department’s request and paused Louisiana’s lawsuit but indicated the state could potentially continue its challenge after the FDA concludes its safety review. However, the status and timeline of the FDA review are unclear

Mifepristone policy raised in confirmation process

Blanche’s recent comments came as he sought Senate confirmation as attorney general.

His nomination was advanced by the Senate Judiciary Committee Aug. 4. Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, said in a statement acknowledging the committee vote that during Blanche’s hearing, “a majority of GOP senators on the Judiciary Committee pressed him on abortion drugs, uncomfortable with the continuation of Biden’s illegal mail-order abortion drug regime and the Department of Justice’s opposition in court to pro-life states challenging the scheme.” 

Blanche, she said, “was right when he said, ‘We very much believe the Biden rules were wrong.’ We thank pro-life senators for questioning Acting AG Blanche and urge the Acting AG to swiftly settle the case with Louisiana and abortion drug coercion survivor Rosalie Markezich to immediately get abortion drugs out of the mail while the FDA’s safety study continues.”

Blanche’s path to confirmation by the full Senate is narrow. Of three senators seen as key swing votes, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who is seeking reelection in a swing state in November, said Aug. 4 she will not support Blanche’s nomination. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, on Aug. 7 said she would not support Blanche, while Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., said the same day he would. 

Senate GOP leadership can afford to lose just two Republicans if Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., remains absent from the upper chamber and if all 47 Senate Democrats vote “no.”

US bishops concerned over abortion pills by mail

The U.S. Catholic bishops will launch a nationwide call to prayer and action on Aug. 18, in what they called an effort to mobilize Catholics to address the rising abortion rate and the increased availability of mifepristone for abortion via mail.

According to an estimate from Guttmacher Institute, a research firm that supports legal abortion access, 1.12 million abortions took place in the U.S. in 2025, marking a 21% increase from 2020, “the last year of comprehensive national estimates” before Dobbs. It found 2025 figures were largely unchanged from the prior year but suggested they might be low due to the ability to acquire abortion pills by means other than U.S. abortion clinic providers.

Monday, July 27, 2026

Despite Dobbs, sadly, abortions still rising due to mail-order chemical abortions

 

Abortion count rises as women turn to chemical abortions, per new data

The abortion count is rising as women rely more on mail-order chemical abortions, according to the most recent data.


Credit: Yta23/Shutterstock


Kate QuiƱones
July 24, 2026, at 2:31 PM ET

The U.S. abortion count continues to rise even as travel abortions decrease, a recent study found.

The Guttmacher Institute, a data group that openly supports abortion access, documented a decrease in people leaving their own state to get abortions in other states. Instead, abortion seekers turn toward mail-order abortions, which have seen a surge in recent years.

The group tracks abortions monthly, following trends “in the post-Dobbs era” since 2023, according to Guttmacher data scientist and study lead Isaac Maddow-Zimet.

The data indicated an overall increase in abortions from 2025 to 2026.

“In the first three months of 2026, there were 296,130 abortions as compared to 292,590 in the first three months of 2025,” data scholar Michael New told EWTN News. “This is an increase of just over 1%.”

New said this fact has gone underreported.

“Most media outlets that are reporting on the Guttmacher data have not reported on this, but the number of abortions continues to rise,” said New, who is a senior associate scholar at Charlotte Lozier Institute, a group that studies data relating to the pro-life cause.

“These rising abortion numbers are an important reason why pro-lifers are frustrated with the Trump administration’s lack of action on telehealth abortions,” continued New, who also works as a professor at the Busch School of Business at The Catholic University of America.

The Trump administration has neglected to enforce various regulations — such as the Comstock Act or in-person prescription requirements — that could be groundbreaking for protecting unborn children from chemical abortions.

From 2024 to 2025, travel abortions declined by nearly 8%. Scholars agree that mail-order abortion is the reason for the decline in abortion travel.

“Currently, we are seeing a major shift in where and how people access abortion,” Maddow-Zimet said. “While travel remains a critical pathway to care, we have seen a decrease in people leaving their state of residence, likely due to both the growth of telehealth access and fewer options for in-person care in the South and Southeast.”

New also cited chemical abortions as the draw away from travel abortions.

“The main reason for this decline in out-of-state travel is because of the rising number of telehealth abortions,” New said. “The most recent data from the Society for Family Planning shows that approximately 27% of all abortions are done by telehealth.”

In Florida, the study also found a near tripling of abortion travel by Floridians after the state passed a heartbeat law to protect unborn babies; at the same time, fewer people traveled to Florida to obtain abortions due to this law.

“The national decline [in travel abortions] might have been even larger had Florida not started enforcing a Heartbeat Act in 2024,” New said. “Because of this strong pro-life law, far fewer women residing in southern states traveled to Florida for abortions.”

Texas has also seen a decline in Texans traveling to get abortions.

“This trend is seen at the state level,” New continued. “Between 2024 and 2025 the number of Texas women obtaining abortions in other states fell by 19%.”

Mail-order abortion is pro-life priority

Advocates for unborn children highlighted the importance of opposing chemical abortions and protecting unborn children across state lines.

Abortion continues to rise with the increase in mail-order abortions.

Kelsey Pritchard, Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America spokeswoman, called for protections of unborn children across state lines.

“We need a national minimum standard to ensure children across America have basic human rights and the chance at life, regardless of their zip code,” Pritchard told EWTN News.

Nine states and the District of Columbia still have no gestational limits whatsoever on abortion, allowing abortion up to the moment of birth, with late-term abortion centers purposely located within range of pro-life state borders,” Pritchard said. “This is barbaric and extreme, and it places the United States in the same category as communist countries like China and Vietnam on abortion.”

“While stopping the ‘Wild West’ of unregulated abortion by mail is our immediate priority, both issues underscore the urgent need for national action to protect unborn children and their mothers,” Pritchard said.

“Abortion travel is down overall, but mail-order abortions are surging and driving the national total up to an estimated 1.1 million abortions per year — more than the day Roe was reversed,” Pritchard said. “Every single month, approximately 15,000 babies in the womb die from mail-order abortion drugs in states with pro-life laws, while women and girls are poisoned and coerced by abusers who obtain these drugs online without so much as an ID check.”

Kristi Hamrick, Students for Life spokeswoman, questioned the data, noting that there is no reporting requirement for abortion.

“I find it extraordinary that the abortion industry reports so much data that is accepted as gospel, despite the fact that we canʼt verify it,” Hamrick said. “We have no national abortion reporting law, and while this data will be broadly reported, every point of data from pro-life sources is treated as suspect.”

Guttmacher collects monthly data from brick-and-mortar facilities and telehealth providers, according to the study methodology.

The nature of mail-order abortion pills makes it harder to accurately track the number of the abortions in the U.S. as the pills are highly unregulated and some companies operate outside of the U.S. healthcare system.

“The landscape of abortion is shifting, from brick-and-mortar abortion vendor to online pill pushers, so less driving, if that is true, does not mean less abortion,” Hamrick said.

For Students for Life, “fighting chemical abortion pills” is a priority.

Through pregnancy help centers, maternity homes, and other programs, the pro-life movement continues to encourage women to choose life.

“But what is happening in real time is that many are reaching out to women online and in their communities to encourage and support them in choosing life, while we also have to confront a new abortion cartel,” Hamrick said.




Tuesday, July 7, 2026

Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood set to resume as a deadline expires

 

Planned Parenthood to get millions in Medicaid again as defunding lapses


People check computers outside of a Planned Parenthood mobile clinic in Chicago Aug. 19, 2024. Federal funding for Planned Parenthood resumed July 5, 2026, after a provision of the One Big Beautiful Bill prohibiting those funds expired on Independence Day. (OSV News photo/Vincent Alban, Reuters)

WASHINGTON (OSV News) — A provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” that stopped Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid payments for a year expired July 4, allowing the nation’s largest abortion provider to regain access to hundreds of millions of dollars in Medicaid funding.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed by President Donald Trump on July 4, 2025, enacted key items from his legislative agenda on issues including taxes and immigration. It also included a provision eliminating Medicaid funds to health providers who also perform abortions, but only for one year.

Although it was not named in the provision, Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, sued in response, arguing the parameters for ending these funds effectively singled it out. However, courts eventually allowed the provision to go into effect.

Pro-life group urges defunding in next reconciliation bill

Pro-life groups including Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America have pushed lawmakers to include a similar provision in an upcoming reconciliation bill.

“We are urging the House and the Senate to pass a reconciliation bill that keeps our Medicaid dollars out of the hands of big abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood,” Kelsey Pritchard, SBA’s communications director, told OSV News in a July 6 interview.

Pritchard said SBA has called on lawmakers to include a similar provision in a third reconciliation bill Republicans are seeking to pass before the midterm elections. However, the prospects for that package are unclear, amid disagreements within the party, who hold slim majorities in Congress, about what should be included among several other issues. 

“This is really now the default expectation from the pro-life movement that they do this again,” she said.

In a July 1 statement regarding the expired provision, Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America and Planned Parenthood Action Fund, said, “By deliberately targeting Planned Parenthood, President Trump and his allies in Congress worsened a public health crisis, making it harder for people to get the essential and lifesaving care they needed at their trusted provider.”

The organization’s latest annual report, which reflected its fiscal year as of June 30, 2025, just days before the defunding provision went into effect, showed it performed 434,450 abortions, an increase of over 32,200, or 8%, from the previous year’s report. Meanwhile, the same report showed 389,449 total cancer screening and prevention services — such as pap tests and HPV vaccinations — a decrease from 426,268 the previous year.

Defunding lapse ‘moral failure’

In a July 4 statement, Lila Rose, founder and president of Live Action, struck a more critical tone toward Congress, calling the decision to let the defunding provision lapse a “moral failure.”

“On America’s 250th birthday, Congress had the chance to honor the founding promise that every human being has a God-given right to life. Instead, by failing to extend the defunding of Planned Parenthood, lawmakers have allowed taxpayer dollars to flow back to the largest abortion chain in the nation,” she said. “This is a moral failure and an urgent betrayal of preborn children, women, and American taxpayers.”

Rose said Planned Parenthood “is not a neutral health care organization” and “this failure must be corrected immediately.” 

“President Trump and Congress must act as fast as possible to restore and extend the defunding of Planned Parenthood and every organization that commits abortion,” Rose said. 

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Pro-Life Activities touted the defunding provision as one of “several pro-life victories” in its 2026 message on the 53rd anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion nationwide as a constitutional right that was overturned in 2022 with the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision.

The Catholic Church teaches that all human life is sacred from conception to natural death, and as such, opposes direct abortion. After Dobbs, Church officials in the U.S. have reiterated the Church’s concern for both mother and child, and called for strengthening support for those living in poverty or other causes that can push women toward having an abortion.

Kate Scanlon is a national reporter for OSV News covering Washington. Follow her on X @kgscanlon.

Thursday, February 12, 2026

Indiana Bishop speaks out against Notre Dame's appointment of abortion advocate

 

Bishop Rhoades calls on Notre Dame to reverse new director’s appointment over abortion advocacy


(OSV News) — An Indiana bishop is urging the University of Notre Dame to halt the appointment of a faculty member, who advocates openly for abortion, as head of one of the school’s research centers.

The matter highlights the role of Catholic universities in the life of the Church, as delineated in St. John Paul II’s 1990 apostolic constitution, “Ex Corde Ecclesiae,” for which the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops approved a particular application in 1999.

Bishop Kevin C. Rhoades of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Indiana, issued a Feb. 11 statement expressing “dismay” and “strong opposition” to the university’s appointment of associate professor Susan Ostermann as director of the Liu Institute for Asia and Asian Studies, effective July 1. Notre Dame is located adjacent to South Bend, Indiana, the state’s fourth largest city.


The institute is part of the university’s Keough School of Global Affairs, of which Ostermann — who specializes in the study of regulatory compliance, comparative politics and environmental regulation, with a focus on South Asia — is a faculty member. The appointment, announced on Jan. 8, has drawn fire from Notre Dame faculty and staff due to Ostermann’s robust public endorsement of legal abortion, and her work as a consultant for the Population Council, an international research and policy firm that works to advance “sexual and reproductive health, rights and choices” as a key aim. At least two Notre Dame faculty members, professor Diane Desierto and emeritus professor Robert Gimello, resigned their roles at the Liu Institute in protest, according to The Observer, Notre Dame’s student-run newspaper.



The University of Notre Dame announced Jan. 8, 2026, that Susan Ostermann, who supports keeping abortion legal, has been appointed as director of the university’s Liu Institute for Asia and Asian Studies. Ostermann is pictured in a Sept. 16, 2021, photo. (OSV News photo/Matt Cashore, University of Notre Dame)

Ostermann’s abortion advocacy

In his statement, Bishop Rhoades said Ostermann’s “extensive public advocacy of abortion rights and her disparaging and inflammatory remarks about those who uphold the dignity of human life from the moment of conception to natural death go against a core principle of justice that is central to Notre Dame’s Catholic identity and mission.”

Bishop Rhoades — noting he had read “many of the op-ed pieces co-authored by Professor Ostermann — said the appointment was “causing scandal to the faithful of our diocese and beyond.”

In one such piece, published by the Chicago Tribune in December 2022, Ostermann and former faculty colleague Tamara Kay (who left Notre Dame for the University of Pittsburgh, following outcry over her endorsement of legalized abortion) surveyed “lies about abortion” that have “dictated public policy.”

Among those lies, wrote Ostermann and Kay, was that “abortion kills babies.”

“Almost 90% of abortions occur during the first 10 weeks of pregnancy when there are no babies or fetuses. There are only blastocysts or embryos so tiny they are too small to be seen on an abdominal ultrasound,” wrote Ostermann and Kay.

‘Outrageous claims’ about the pro-life position cited

The same article also described crisis pregnancy centers as “anti-abortion rights propaganda sites” that “operate and provide false information to women who are lured to them believing they will receive legitimate medical care.” 

Ostermann and Kay further asserted that “women who are denied an abortion experience a panoply of negative outcomes physically, mentally and occupationally.”

Bishop Rhoades quoted additional writings by Ostermann in his statement, noting she had claimed the pro-life position has “its roots in white supremacy and racism,” with misogyny “embedded” in the movement.”

“She also argued that the Catholic social doctrine of ‘integral human development’ supports abortion because it enhances freedom and flourishing for women,” said Bishop Rhoades.

“These are all outrageous claims that should disqualify her from an administrative and leadership role at a Catholic university,” he said. “I hope that Professor Ostermann will explicitly retract these claims, and I pray that she will have a change of mind and heart that will lead her to affirm the innate dignity of unborn babies as well as that of their mothers.”

In a statement provided to OSV News, Ostermann said that her “primary focus is to serve as a steward for the Liu Institute mission in the context of the University’s larger mission, and a facilitator for our world-class faculty. 

“I am fully committed to maintaining an environment of academic freedom where a plurality of voices can flourish,” she said. “I have long worked with scholars who hold diverse views on a multitude of issues, and I welcome the opportunity to continue doing so. While I hold my own convictions on complex social and legal issues, I want to be clear: my role is to support the diverse research of our scholars and students, not to advance a personal political agenda.”

“This commitment to academic inquiry and mutual respect is deeply rooted in my appreciation for Notre Dame’s identity as a global Catholic research university,” Ostermann continued. “I am inspired by the University’s focus on Integral Human Development, which calls us to promote the dignity and flourishing of every person. I respect Notre Dame’s institutional position on the sanctity of life at every stage. By fostering a collaborative space that values rigorous inquiry, we contribute in important ways to global development and human well-being. As Liu Director, I look forward to working closely with my colleagues to ensure the Liu Institute remains a place where truth is pursued with both excellence and integrity.”

Bishop Rhoades reminds Notre Dame about papal witness to life

In his statement, Bishop Rhoades cited a Nov. 15, 2014, address by Pope Francis in which the late pontiff denounced “false compassion which holds that it is a benefit to women to promote abortion.”

“The Church here in our diocese and around the world serves mothers before and after birth, providing spiritual, emotional, and material care to moms in need,” said Bishop Rhoades. “The Church stands for the inalienable right to life of mothers and their unborn children.”

Bishop Rhoades said that “Notre Dame has publicly committed as a Catholic institution to the life and dignity of the human person,” affirming the Church’s teaching that “human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception,” as the Catechism of the Catholic Church states.

“I am proud of Notre Dame’s pro-life commitment, manifest in the large number of students and faculty who promote a culture of life through many campus organizations, programs, and activities,” Bishop Rhoades said. “They witness to the sanctity of life at every stage, with special attention to the lives of the vulnerable, including the unborn, the poor, immigrants, the elderly, and the infirm.”

He stressed that “the Catholic Church upholds a consistent ethic of life,” pointing to Pope Leo XIV’s recent citation of St. Teresa of Calcutta’s address at the National Prayer Breakfast in February 1994, in which she said “the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion.”

Bishop Rhoades also quoted Pope Leo, who in a Jan. 31 address observed that “no policy can genuinely serve the people if it denies the unborn the gift of life, or if it neglects to support those in need whether in their material circumstances or in their spiritual distress.”

Bishop Rhoades said that “this pro-life principle is not merely affirmed by Catholics; it is embraced by many people of good will of diverse backgrounds and commitments around the world.”

Catholic social teaching does not support abortion

With the Keough Institute endorsing integral human development as the primary Catholic social teaching principle for its work, said Bishop Rhoades, “Professor Ostermann has written — ludicrously — that this Catholic principle actually supports abortion on demand.”

Yet the Holy See has repeatedly affirmed to the United Nations that the inherent right to life is central to integral human development, said the bishop.

“Professor Ostermann’s opposite view thus clearly should disqualify her from holding a position of leadership within the Keough School,” he said.

He added that Ostermann’s consultancy for the Population Council was another disqualifier for the Liu Institute appointment, since the council is “dedicated to the promotion of abortion around the world, “linked to China’s population control policies that have resulted in hundreds of millions of abortions of baby girls,” and “instrumental in securing approval of the abortion pill by the FDA, which is responsible for the majority of abortions in the United States.”

“Some may claim that this appointment should be protected by academic freedom,” said Bishop Rhoades noted.

However, he said, “Academic freedom concerns the liberty of faculty to conduct research according to their own professional judgment and interests. 

“This appointment, by contrast, concerns the official administrative appointment to lead an academic unit,” he said. “Such appointments have profound impact on the integrity of Notre Dame’s public witness as a Catholic university.”

‘Still time to make things right’ at Notre Dame

Ostermann’s appointment as the head of the Liu Institute “understandably creates confusion in the public mind as to Notre Dame’s fidelity to its Catholic mission,” said Bishop Rhoades, adding that “many faculty, students, alumni, and benefactors of Notre Dame have reached out to me to express their shock, sadness, confusion, and disappointment” over the move.

Bishop Rhoades urged prayer, particularly to the Virgin Mary under her title Our Lady of Lourdes, asking her to intercede so that “Notre Dame will always stand firm in her commitment to the Gospel of her Son, the Gospel of Life.”

 He cited “Ex Corde Ecclesiae,” which names the local bishop as having particular responsibility to promote and assist in preserving the Catholic identity of Catholic universities within a given diocese.

“I call upon the leadership of Notre Dame to rectify this situation,” said Bishop Rhoades. “The appointment of Professor Ostermann is not scheduled to go into effect until July 1, 2026. There is still time to make things right.”

 

Gina Christian is a multimedia reporter for OSV News. Follow her on X @GinaJesseReina.