I marvel at how this Kennedy descendent continues to get such press simply because she is Catholic but prefers her partisan political views over the teachings of Holy Mother Church.
Of course, I'm giving her play here on my own blog. As we journey through Lent together, I still find this worthy to publish. She couches the argument skillfully to discount the truth taught by the church and safeguarding one particular political parties agenda.
She does not care for balance. I for one say yes, cry from the dome of Catholicism for the poor and needy, the immigrant, and yes, for health care that truly promotes the common good and the life, liberty and dignity of all human beings; from conception to natural death.
Ted, Robert and even John may be gone now. Patrick is even retreating. But good ole' Kathleen lives on by bashing the church she claims to love. Love and a church made and shaped in her own image.
And a little warning to those who blow hard politically from the right; know the fullness of truth as taught by Holy Mother Church too. Not all who waive their religious criticism for all to see come from the left!
Religion and politics: Devout Catholic Kathleen Kennedy Townsend still pushing church buttons
By Matthias Gafni
Contra Costa Times
It didn't take long for Kathleen Kennedy Townsend to show Saint Mary's College students the renegade Catholic streak that got her blacklisted from religious speaking engagements and condemned by her parish priest.
"I think if you're in love, you should get married," the eldest daughter of Robert Kennedy said Tuesday when asked for her thoughts on same-sex marriage. "I think that's what Christ preached — love. "... So, Hallelujah for the lucky people in California that got the chance to be married."
The 58-year-old former lieutenant governor of Maryland rarely pulls a punch, particularly when discussing her celebrated Irish Catholic roots and frustration with her church's politics. She spoke to a packed Soda Center audience on the Moraga campus Tuesday night and in an earlier Times interview.
"The churches have failed America because they've narrowed faith to three issues: abortion, same-sex marriage and stem cell research," Townsend said. "And I thought that my faith tradition was we should care about the least among us. We should care about the poor, health care, immigration."
Townsend is spending the week at Saint Mary's College as a Woodrow Wilson Visiting Fellow. She wrote the 2007 book "Failing America's Faithful: How Today's Churches are Mixing God with Politics and Losing Their Way."
"Every progressive movement in the United States has had a religious underpinning and so it's critically important for
those of the progressive ilk to find their religious roots," she said.
However, she has grown increasingly frustrated with Catholicism's political pillars. She wrote in the Nov. 6 issue of Newsweek about her disappointment with Catholic bishops speaking out against health care reform based on the abortion issue.
"Why are we hearing more about abortion and less about immigrants?" she asked. "That's always the criticism that they seem to be more interested in the unborn rather than the people actually here among us.
"I think that the bishops should be galvanizing support for the health care bill. We have 40 million Americans without health care, we should cover them and that's what the bishops should be fighting for and working for and speaking about. That is in St. Matthew's gospel: caring for the least among us."
The church has struck back, denying her speaking engagements at Catholic schools in her home diocese of Baltimore.
"But that happened a while ago and I just realized they are afraid of women," she said with a chuckle. "And it took them 300 years to realize that Galileo was right."
Although she pushes her church for change, Townsend speaks fondly of her devout upbringing. The oldest of 11 siblings, she grew up in a house with Holy Water fonts and paintings of saints in each room, and a grandmother who prayed for parking spaces through St. Anthony.
"This church has very important teachings and has been a great source of comfort and solace to me and to my family in times of sorrow, and there have been many," she said.
"And I'm not going to let them kick me out. I'm an American and I know that institutions don't always work, but I believe in institutions and I want to make this one work."
Showing posts with label Kathleen Kennedy Townsend. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kathleen Kennedy Townsend. Show all posts
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Obama more Catholic than the Pope; Please?
The article below is a response to Newsweek who published a guest column by Kathleen Kennedy-Townsend, daughter of the late Robert Kennedy. In her article K-T makes the eye popping declaration "Obama more Catholic than Pope." Her 1st premise is Obama represents American Catholics more so than the Holy Father. OK, here is where this Catholic ordained Deacon gets confused. I've yet to meet an American Catholic. Oh yes, I have met many Catholics who happen to be American. I have even met many Catholics from Australia, Europe, Central and South American, even Canada. THEY ARE CATHOLICS.
Ms. K-T seems to think that to be Catholic, one must have a strong politician teach us doctrine and dogma, faith and morals. While it is true that we should hope for the best qualities in all elected officials, I still don't want to get my Catholicism from them. It truly appears to me that K-T has some strong goals in her lame attempt to write an article based on fact. One goal would appear to help drive a rift between Catholics in America that admire President Obama at the expense of the Holy Father. And vice versa, knowing that she will get a reaction, her backhanded hope is to take those who already disdain our President to a new level of distrust and perhaps even hate.
Her description of the Pope's latest encyclical is a wish list of how she wants it to be as the article I've attached so accurately points out. And of course, as is always the case in those who love to bash Catholic heriarchy, no real meaningful discussion on life issues, ethics or true church teaching.
Obama has a job to do as President and when he fails the common good, including on all issues regarding life, we Americans have a job to do to. But President Obama, and all other politicians, are not really in the business of saving souls and helping us to heaven (except that we all carry that responsibility by our Baptism). Pope Benedict is!!! His goal is to not cave in to the politically expedient or popular. His goal is not to promote one country's political agenda. His goal is to be faithful to the teachings of Jesus Christ and the Church He founded some 2000 yrs ago.
You know even the Apostles and the disciples would try to get Jesus to do this, not do that, don't go here, don't say that. Jesus never willy nilly caved in. He did the WILL OF THE FATHER. Maybe K-T and others who want a Catholic Church made in their personal image, or worse, their political image should follow Jesus; do the WILL OF THE FATHER. And guess what; there you will find peace!
And what should our reaction be in light of this article and the recent visit of the Pope and the Pres? Let's keep it simple: pray. Pray for the Holy Father and his intentions. Pray for the President, that he always promote the common good. And pray that he will be converted to a pro-life position that manifests itself in concrete action and not fancy words. Pray for those who attack the Church. For those who attack the Church, attack Christ. Pray for their conversion too. And pray for all those who take their level of disdain and hate against the President and others will remember their Christian duty to be Christian in word and deed. Remember we are called to preach the Gospel always, in all places, and when necessary, use words.
Kennedy-Townsend in Newsweek: Obama 'More Catholic' Than PopeNewsBusters ^ July 9, 2009 Matthew Balan
Posted on Friday, July 10, 2009 4:13:19 AM by Zakeet
Newsweek took their criticism of Pope Benedict XVI to the next level on Thursday- not only did guest columnist Kathleen Kennedy-Townsend affirm that the pontiff could learn from President Obama (something Newsweek and their partners at the Washington Post agreed upon back in April), but also blasted the Bishop of Rome and the Catholic hierarchy for their supposed “disdain” towards women and homosexuals.
The former lieutenant governor of Maryland began her column, titled "Without a Doubt: Why Barack Obama represents American Catholics better than the pope does," with the context of the pope’s upcoming meeting with the American president, and how it was “much anticipated and in some circles frowned upon by American Catholics in the wake of Obama’s controversial Notre Dame commencement speech in May.” She then laid out her central thesis about these two leaders: “In truth, though, Obama’s pragmatic approach to divisive policy...and his social-justice agenda reflect the views of American Catholic laity much more closely than those vocal bishops and pro-life activists...[T]hey’ll politely disagree about reproductive freedoms and homosexuality, but Catholics back home won’t care, because they know Obama’s on their side. In fact, Obama’s agenda is closer to their views than even the pope’s.”
Before outlining the standard heterodox American Catholic complaints about Church teaching, Kennedy-Townsend, as you might expect, laid claim to the pope’s recent social teaching encyclical: “It’s fitting that Obama’s visit comes just days after the publication of “Charity in Truth,” a Vatican encyclical that declares unions, regulation of capitalism’s excesses, and environmentalism to be ethical imperatives. The document gives moral credence to Obama’s message and to progressive politics writ large.”
While this is the standard left-wing spin of the papal document, as exemplified by AP and Reuters' coverage of it, the Democratic politician omitted that these three issues she names are secondary to the link that Benedict XVI made between “life ethics and social ethics, fully aware that ‘a society lacks solid foundations when, on the one hand, it asserts values such as the dignity of the person, justice and peace, but then, on the other hand, radically acts to the contrary by allowing or tolerating a variety of ways in which human life is devalued and violated, especially where it is weak or marginalized.” The pope would go on to condemn “the tragic and widespread scourge of abortion...the systematic eugenic programming of births....[and] practices... [which] foster a materialistic and mechanistic understanding of human life.”
Kennedy-Townsend seemed to ignore this emphasis in the document, and turned to her complaints, making it clear that she disagrees with the Pope and Catholic teaching, and not just concerning these “life issues:”
While the pope preaches love, listening to the other has been a particular stumbling block for the Catholic hierarchy (as it is for many in power). The hierarchy ignores women’s equality and gays’ cry for justice because to heed them would require that it admit error and acknowledge that the self-satisfied edifice constructed around sex and gender has been grievously wrong. Before he became John Paul II, Karol Wojtyla had a telling all-or-nothing formulation: “If it should be decided that contraception is not an evil in itself then we should have to concede frankly that the Holy Spirit is on the side of the Protestant Churches.”
That attitude has resulted in some heinous decisions. Most famously, in the lead up to the encyclical “Humanae Vitae” in 1968, an advisory body of theologians and laity empaneled by the pope advised that the church should reverse its position on birth control and concede that the issue should be a question for morality and for science. But authority—not truth, not love—prevailed: Pope Paul VI, listening to the advice of Wojtyla, disagreed with the majority of these advisers, who had voted 69 to 10 for change, fretting that to change this position would weaken his authority....
In 1979, Sister Theresa Kane, the head of the Sisters of Mercy and the president of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, greeted Pope John Paul II on his first visit to the United States by proposing that the Church provide “for the possibility of women as persons being included in all ministries of our Church,” including the priesthood. This was greeted with revulsion at the Vatican, which insists that the only people who can represent God in the priestly role are those with male sex organs.
After outlining all this, the Democrat boldly proposed that Catholic truth should determined by a majority vote, something that the pontiff (when he was Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger) bluntly objected to:
Yet polls bear out that American Catholics do not want to be told by the Vatican how to think. Despite the rhetoric of love and truth, the Vatican shows disdain (if not disgust) toward gays. But 54 percent of American Catholics find gay relationships to be morally acceptable, according to a 2009 Gallup poll. Meanwhile, against all scientific evidence and protestations from clergy on the ground, the pope claims that condoms aggravate the spread of AIDS. Seventy-nine percent of American Catholics disagree, according to a 2007 poll by Catholics for Choice.
When Sen. John Kerry, a pro-choice Catholic, ran for president in 2004, several bishops decided to deny him communion. A poll done at the time by Time magazine showed that 73 percent of American Catholics disagreed with that decision, and 83 percent said the bishops’ move wouldn't change their vote. In fact, more than two thirds said the church shouldn’t try to influence the way Catholics vote at all or tell candidates—even Catholic ones—what stance to take.
For Obama, respectful disagreement and a willingness to recognize differences was the animating spirit of the presidential campaign, and it was central to his Notre Dame speech. That is the kind of politics many Catholics practice. They’re tired of watching the church grasp frantically for control at the expense of truth and love. In America last November, it showed: 54 percent of Catholics voted for Obama.
Despite her chest-thumping about how the American Catholic populace apparently disagrees with the pope and Catholic dogma, and her claiming of the recent encyclical for the “progressives,” it is clear that Kennedy-Townsend, a member of a family of notoriously heterodox Catholics, didn’t learn a valuable lesson from the papal writing. From paragraph 3 of “Caritas in Veritate:”
Only in truth does charity shine forth [emphasis in original], only in truth can charity be authentically lived. Truth is the light that gives meaning and value to charity. That light is both the light of reason and the light of faith, through which the intellect attains to the natural and supernatural truth of charity: it grasps its meaning as gift, acceptance, and communion. Without truth, charity degenerates into sentimentality. Love becomes an empty shell, to be filled in an arbitrary way. In a culture without truth, this is the fatal risk facing love. It falls prey to contingent subjective emotions and opinions, the word “love” is abused and distorted, to the point where it comes to mean the opposite. Truth frees charity from the constraints of an emotionalism that deprives it of relational and social content, and of a fideism that deprives it of human and universal breathing-space. In the truth, charity reflects the personal yet public dimension of faith in the God of the Bible, who is both Agápe and Lógos: Charity and Truth, Love and Word.
The predictions of Paul VI concerning contraception in “Humanae Vitae,” the encyclical which the columnist condemned in her column, have been thoroughly proven to be true- “widespread use of contraceptives would lead to ‘conjugal infidelity and the general lowering of morality,’ and that many a man would lose respect for the woman in his life and ‘no longer [care] for her physical and psychological equilibrium’ to the point that he would consider her ‘as a mere instrument of selfish enjoyment, and no longer as his respected and beloved companion,’” as Kathryn Jean Lopez summarized them, quoting from the 1968 encyclical. More importantly, the Catholic Church, through its fidelity to its traditional teachings on human sexuality, is not merely trying to preserve its “authority,” as Kennedy-Townsend accused in her column (viewing the Church through the rose-colored lenses of left-wing political philosophy), but is motivated its vision of truth and love, those two things which she denies are the driving forces of the Church in this key area of human affairs.
It is clear that Kennedy-Townsend, and the millions of Catholics who dissent from Church teaching, will not be satisfied, nor will they tolerate the Church, until she conforms to the secular order. Now who are the intolerant ones?
Ms. K-T seems to think that to be Catholic, one must have a strong politician teach us doctrine and dogma, faith and morals. While it is true that we should hope for the best qualities in all elected officials, I still don't want to get my Catholicism from them. It truly appears to me that K-T has some strong goals in her lame attempt to write an article based on fact. One goal would appear to help drive a rift between Catholics in America that admire President Obama at the expense of the Holy Father. And vice versa, knowing that she will get a reaction, her backhanded hope is to take those who already disdain our President to a new level of distrust and perhaps even hate.
Her description of the Pope's latest encyclical is a wish list of how she wants it to be as the article I've attached so accurately points out. And of course, as is always the case in those who love to bash Catholic heriarchy, no real meaningful discussion on life issues, ethics or true church teaching.
Obama has a job to do as President and when he fails the common good, including on all issues regarding life, we Americans have a job to do to. But President Obama, and all other politicians, are not really in the business of saving souls and helping us to heaven (except that we all carry that responsibility by our Baptism). Pope Benedict is!!! His goal is to not cave in to the politically expedient or popular. His goal is not to promote one country's political agenda. His goal is to be faithful to the teachings of Jesus Christ and the Church He founded some 2000 yrs ago.
You know even the Apostles and the disciples would try to get Jesus to do this, not do that, don't go here, don't say that. Jesus never willy nilly caved in. He did the WILL OF THE FATHER. Maybe K-T and others who want a Catholic Church made in their personal image, or worse, their political image should follow Jesus; do the WILL OF THE FATHER. And guess what; there you will find peace!
And what should our reaction be in light of this article and the recent visit of the Pope and the Pres? Let's keep it simple: pray. Pray for the Holy Father and his intentions. Pray for the President, that he always promote the common good. And pray that he will be converted to a pro-life position that manifests itself in concrete action and not fancy words. Pray for those who attack the Church. For those who attack the Church, attack Christ. Pray for their conversion too. And pray for all those who take their level of disdain and hate against the President and others will remember their Christian duty to be Christian in word and deed. Remember we are called to preach the Gospel always, in all places, and when necessary, use words.
Kennedy-Townsend in Newsweek: Obama 'More Catholic' Than PopeNewsBusters ^ July 9, 2009 Matthew Balan
Posted on Friday, July 10, 2009 4:13:19 AM by Zakeet
Newsweek took their criticism of Pope Benedict XVI to the next level on Thursday- not only did guest columnist Kathleen Kennedy-Townsend affirm that the pontiff could learn from President Obama (something Newsweek and their partners at the Washington Post agreed upon back in April), but also blasted the Bishop of Rome and the Catholic hierarchy for their supposed “disdain” towards women and homosexuals.
The former lieutenant governor of Maryland began her column, titled "Without a Doubt: Why Barack Obama represents American Catholics better than the pope does," with the context of the pope’s upcoming meeting with the American president, and how it was “much anticipated and in some circles frowned upon by American Catholics in the wake of Obama’s controversial Notre Dame commencement speech in May.” She then laid out her central thesis about these two leaders: “In truth, though, Obama’s pragmatic approach to divisive policy...and his social-justice agenda reflect the views of American Catholic laity much more closely than those vocal bishops and pro-life activists...[T]hey’ll politely disagree about reproductive freedoms and homosexuality, but Catholics back home won’t care, because they know Obama’s on their side. In fact, Obama’s agenda is closer to their views than even the pope’s.”
Before outlining the standard heterodox American Catholic complaints about Church teaching, Kennedy-Townsend, as you might expect, laid claim to the pope’s recent social teaching encyclical: “It’s fitting that Obama’s visit comes just days after the publication of “Charity in Truth,” a Vatican encyclical that declares unions, regulation of capitalism’s excesses, and environmentalism to be ethical imperatives. The document gives moral credence to Obama’s message and to progressive politics writ large.”
While this is the standard left-wing spin of the papal document, as exemplified by AP and Reuters' coverage of it, the Democratic politician omitted that these three issues she names are secondary to the link that Benedict XVI made between “life ethics and social ethics, fully aware that ‘a society lacks solid foundations when, on the one hand, it asserts values such as the dignity of the person, justice and peace, but then, on the other hand, radically acts to the contrary by allowing or tolerating a variety of ways in which human life is devalued and violated, especially where it is weak or marginalized.” The pope would go on to condemn “the tragic and widespread scourge of abortion...the systematic eugenic programming of births....[and] practices... [which] foster a materialistic and mechanistic understanding of human life.”
Kennedy-Townsend seemed to ignore this emphasis in the document, and turned to her complaints, making it clear that she disagrees with the Pope and Catholic teaching, and not just concerning these “life issues:”
While the pope preaches love, listening to the other has been a particular stumbling block for the Catholic hierarchy (as it is for many in power). The hierarchy ignores women’s equality and gays’ cry for justice because to heed them would require that it admit error and acknowledge that the self-satisfied edifice constructed around sex and gender has been grievously wrong. Before he became John Paul II, Karol Wojtyla had a telling all-or-nothing formulation: “If it should be decided that contraception is not an evil in itself then we should have to concede frankly that the Holy Spirit is on the side of the Protestant Churches.”
That attitude has resulted in some heinous decisions. Most famously, in the lead up to the encyclical “Humanae Vitae” in 1968, an advisory body of theologians and laity empaneled by the pope advised that the church should reverse its position on birth control and concede that the issue should be a question for morality and for science. But authority—not truth, not love—prevailed: Pope Paul VI, listening to the advice of Wojtyla, disagreed with the majority of these advisers, who had voted 69 to 10 for change, fretting that to change this position would weaken his authority....
In 1979, Sister Theresa Kane, the head of the Sisters of Mercy and the president of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, greeted Pope John Paul II on his first visit to the United States by proposing that the Church provide “for the possibility of women as persons being included in all ministries of our Church,” including the priesthood. This was greeted with revulsion at the Vatican, which insists that the only people who can represent God in the priestly role are those with male sex organs.
After outlining all this, the Democrat boldly proposed that Catholic truth should determined by a majority vote, something that the pontiff (when he was Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger) bluntly objected to:
Yet polls bear out that American Catholics do not want to be told by the Vatican how to think. Despite the rhetoric of love and truth, the Vatican shows disdain (if not disgust) toward gays. But 54 percent of American Catholics find gay relationships to be morally acceptable, according to a 2009 Gallup poll. Meanwhile, against all scientific evidence and protestations from clergy on the ground, the pope claims that condoms aggravate the spread of AIDS. Seventy-nine percent of American Catholics disagree, according to a 2007 poll by Catholics for Choice.
When Sen. John Kerry, a pro-choice Catholic, ran for president in 2004, several bishops decided to deny him communion. A poll done at the time by Time magazine showed that 73 percent of American Catholics disagreed with that decision, and 83 percent said the bishops’ move wouldn't change their vote. In fact, more than two thirds said the church shouldn’t try to influence the way Catholics vote at all or tell candidates—even Catholic ones—what stance to take.
For Obama, respectful disagreement and a willingness to recognize differences was the animating spirit of the presidential campaign, and it was central to his Notre Dame speech. That is the kind of politics many Catholics practice. They’re tired of watching the church grasp frantically for control at the expense of truth and love. In America last November, it showed: 54 percent of Catholics voted for Obama.
Despite her chest-thumping about how the American Catholic populace apparently disagrees with the pope and Catholic dogma, and her claiming of the recent encyclical for the “progressives,” it is clear that Kennedy-Townsend, a member of a family of notoriously heterodox Catholics, didn’t learn a valuable lesson from the papal writing. From paragraph 3 of “Caritas in Veritate:”
Only in truth does charity shine forth [emphasis in original], only in truth can charity be authentically lived. Truth is the light that gives meaning and value to charity. That light is both the light of reason and the light of faith, through which the intellect attains to the natural and supernatural truth of charity: it grasps its meaning as gift, acceptance, and communion. Without truth, charity degenerates into sentimentality. Love becomes an empty shell, to be filled in an arbitrary way. In a culture without truth, this is the fatal risk facing love. It falls prey to contingent subjective emotions and opinions, the word “love” is abused and distorted, to the point where it comes to mean the opposite. Truth frees charity from the constraints of an emotionalism that deprives it of relational and social content, and of a fideism that deprives it of human and universal breathing-space. In the truth, charity reflects the personal yet public dimension of faith in the God of the Bible, who is both Agápe and Lógos: Charity and Truth, Love and Word.
The predictions of Paul VI concerning contraception in “Humanae Vitae,” the encyclical which the columnist condemned in her column, have been thoroughly proven to be true- “widespread use of contraceptives would lead to ‘conjugal infidelity and the general lowering of morality,’ and that many a man would lose respect for the woman in his life and ‘no longer [care] for her physical and psychological equilibrium’ to the point that he would consider her ‘as a mere instrument of selfish enjoyment, and no longer as his respected and beloved companion,’” as Kathryn Jean Lopez summarized them, quoting from the 1968 encyclical. More importantly, the Catholic Church, through its fidelity to its traditional teachings on human sexuality, is not merely trying to preserve its “authority,” as Kennedy-Townsend accused in her column (viewing the Church through the rose-colored lenses of left-wing political philosophy), but is motivated its vision of truth and love, those two things which she denies are the driving forces of the Church in this key area of human affairs.
It is clear that Kennedy-Townsend, and the millions of Catholics who dissent from Church teaching, will not be satisfied, nor will they tolerate the Church, until she conforms to the secular order. Now who are the intolerant ones?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)