Showing posts with label religious freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religious freedom. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 4, 2026

The Republican Attorney General of Florida threatens Catholic Schools and the Bishops of Florida over vaccine exemptions based in faith

 

Florida AG’s threat to Catholic schools ‘clear violation’ of the First Amendment, law scholar says


(OSV News) — Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier sent a letter to the Catholic bishops of Florida demanding that Catholic schools in the Sunshine State adopt religious exemptions to vaccine requirements or risk their ability to participate in the state’s school voucher program.

But Rick Garnett, a professor of law at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, told OSV News that the letter “reflects a misunderstanding of Americans’ fundamental right to religious freedom and is a glaring and dangerous government overreach.”

In the letter, dated July 31, Uthmeier argued that Florida law “requires public and private schools to exempt students from the vaccination requirements” if “a parent has a religious objection,” demanding that Catholic schools “comply with Florida law and grant religious exemptions to school vaccine policies.”

Florida AG identifies himself as a Catholic

Identifying himself as a Catholic, Uthmeier argued that while Florida law permits a religious school “to claim an exemption from the requirement to grant religious exemptions if granting such an exemption would violate the religious tenets of the school,” Catholic schools have no “legitimate religious reason to refuse.”

“Failure to comply could jeopardize eligibility for state educational scholarship programs,” he wrote. “If the Conference nevertheless refuses to comply with Florida law, then please state clearly the religious grounds on which Catholic schools may force persons to take vaccines derived from abortions against their deeply held moral and religious objections.”

But Garnett said, “the attorney general presumes, ‘as a Catholic,’ to second-guess the orthodoxy of the Catholic bishops’ determination regarding policies for Catholic schools and the morality of certain childhood vaccines.” 

“However, it is not remotely the role of a government official, even a Catholic one, to tell the bishops what to teach or how to run the Church’s apostolates,” Garnett said. “It is certainly not up to him to decide whether the Catholic bishops’ reasons are ‘legitimate.'”

Garnett said Uthmeier “should withdraw the letter and apologize publicly for creating confusion on such important matters.”

‘Clear violation of First Amendment’

“For a government official to threaten official punishments — and to jeopardize the ability of parents in Florida to choose Catholic schools for their children — on the basis of his own — in this case, mistaken — interpretation of Catholic teaching is a clear violation of the First Amendment and other legal religious-freedom protections,” Garnett said.

“If a parent objects to these vaccines, which the Church teaches are morally permissible and which clearly serve the common good of the community, they may move their children to state-run schools,” Garnett continued. “No one has a ‘right,’ however, to require a Catholic school to conform with his or her own private judgments.”

Uthmeier’s letter to the bishops was addressed to Michael Sheedy, executive director of the Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops. A spokesperson for FCCB told OSV News that the conference was reviewing Uthmeier’s letter and planned to respond by Aug. 7, the date he requested. Uthmeier referenced a diocesan document that appears to have been taken offline as of Aug. 3, which he said cited the National Catholic Bioethics Center as stating that Catholic schools cannot grant an exception since the Church does not view these vaccines as intrinsically evil. 

Documents on NCBC site do not appear to make such a claim

However, documents on the National Catholic Bioethics Center’s website do not appear to make such a claim. But they do state the church’s position that Catholics may undergo vaccination despite a remote connection to cell lines where no alternatives exist. However, they argue Catholics should do so “under protest,” and encourage the development of ethical cell lines. 

OSV News asked a spokesperson for the National Catholic Bioethics Center for comment but had not yet received comment as of publication.

During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, shortly before vaccines first became available to the general American public, the Holy See’s Congregation (now Dicastery) for the Doctrine of the Faith, Catholic bishops and theologians including NCBC all released statements that the COVID-19 vaccines were morally permissible for Catholics to receive.

Bishops encouraged Catholics to seek some vaccine brands over others

Those statements varied only slightly, as the U.S. bishops encouraged Catholics, where they had such a choice, to seek some brands of vaccines over others due to the varying degrees of remote connection to such cell lines. 

Neither the Pfizer nor Moderna COVID-19 vaccines used those cell lines for producing their mRNA vaccines; however, they did involve testing using the HEK-293 cell line, which is believed to have been derived from aborted fetal cells in the 1970s. However, that line has been commonly used in testing a vast array of modern drugs, such as Advil and Tums. Novavax did not use fetal cell lines in either the production or testing of its protein-based COVID-19 vaccine.

Tuesday, July 28, 2026

Border wall policies of Trump administration requires seizure of pilgrimage site in New Mexico

 

Court battle continues as lawmaker intervenes to save pilgrimage site from Trump seizure





(OSV News) — The Trump administration’s move to seize a New Mexico pilgrimage site for border wall construction — despite religious liberty objections — continues to be contested in court, as a Texas lawmaker has introduced legislation to stop the takeover.

An attorney working to protect the site called the federal government’s claim, which seeks to dismiss any consideration of religious freedom, “a stunning and legally untenable position.”

The Diocese of Las Cruces, New Mexico, has for several weeks been battling the administration’s efforts to gain control over a 14-acre parcel that includes Mount Cristo Rey, located in Sunland Park, New Mexico.

Century-old shrine

The 4,675-foot peak, capped by a 29-foot limestone statue of Jesus Christ the King, has served as a shrine for Catholic faithful for close to a century. 

Each year, thousands trek up the rugged path to the image, which depicts a robed Christ with arms stretched out against the cross, overlooking El Paso, Texas, and southern New Mexico landscapes.

The federal government filed a May 7 lawsuit, claiming eminent domain — or government power to seize private property for public use, with “just compensation” as required by the Fifth Amendment — over the land.

The diocese has invoked its rights under the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the latter of which expands protections for religious exercise beyond those covered under the former.

RFRA prohibits the government from placing a substantial burden on a person’s exercise of religion without compelling government interest, and even in those circumstances, requires that they do so by the least restrictive means.


An aerial view shows a cross atop Mount Cristo Rey near the U.S.-Mexico border in Sunland Park, N.M., Aug. 8, 2025. (OSV News photo/Paul Ratje, Reuters)


Mount Cristo Rey Protection Act

As the case plays out in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico, Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-Texas, introduced the “Mount Cristo Rey Protection Act” July 20. 

The measure would recognize the property as a holy site, while prohibiting the use of federal funds for both building the intended border wall at Mount Cristo Rey and for litigating against the Las Cruces Diocese.

The same day Escobar announced the proposed protection act, the Trump administration told the court that the diocese’s religious freedom argument was “wrong and unsupported by any case law.”

“The First Amendment is not a shield from condemnation; it does not grant churches or newsrooms or places of assembly immunity from condemnation,” said the federal government — using the synonymous legal term for eminent domain — in a July 20 filing. 

Instead, said the Trump administration, the “only constitutional limitation” is the Fifth Amendment’s just compensation requirement.

“The Diocese is not the first religious institution from whom the federal government has condemned land,” but “at least the sixth,” said the federal government in its filing.

But such “complete disregard of the protections afforded by the First Amendment and RFRA” is “a stunning and legally untenable position,” said Jonathan Backer, senior counsel at the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown University and one of the attorneys representing the Diocese of Las Cruces in the case.

Religious liberty objections to be heard

In a July 27 email to OSV News, Backer noted that while the federal government has already taken the title to the land — following a June 15 ruling by U.S. District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales — “the court has not authorized the government to come onto the property and begin constructing a border wall.”

“The court has made clear that the diocese will be heard on its religious liberty objections,” said Backer.

Those objections include the diocese’s assertions that the federal government’s plan would “deface” Mount Cristo Rey, and “profane” the site with the presence of a border wall segment that would in turn likely “damage or restrict access to this sacred space.”

In addition, the diocese said in that filing, the Trump administration’s move to condemn the land and take immediate possession would “deprive” the diocese of its stewardship responsibilities, which ensure that “successor landowners do not use Diocesan property in ways that are inconsistent with Catholic values and teachings.”

Just compensation disputed

The diocese has also demanded a jury trial to settle the amount of the legally required just compensation, determined by the fair market value of the property, which the federal government currently estimates to be $183,071.

But in its July 6 filing, the diocese rejected that amount, noting that the federal government “has not conducted a site visit” to assess the property.

In addition, said the diocese, the federal government assessed a much higher value for a nearby state-owned 7.3-acre site it also wishes to seize for the border wall, valuing that parcel at $798,500.

On June 28, Bishop Peter Baldacchino of Las Cruces led more than 500 faithful from the dioceses of Las Cruces and El Paso, along with the Archdiocese of Santa Fe, in pilgrimage and prayer to protect the shrine.

In his homily at the Mass he concelebrated on the mountain with Auxiliary Bishop Anthony C. Celino of El Paso, Bishop Baldacchino prayed that civil leaders would uphold religious liberty, which he noted is regarded by the Church as “not an optional charity,” but rather as “a basic right” that “protects the Church’s ability to serve publicly.”

Gonzales has given the diocese until Aug. 3 to reply to the federal government’s latest filing, with the Trump administration subsequently due to respond by Aug. 10.

Monday, July 6, 2026

On 4th of July, Pope Leo pays visit to the U.S. embassy; states he is rooting for Team USA in World Cup

 

Pope visits U.S. embassy July 4 for discussion on peace and freedom, with a side of apple pie


Pope Leo XIV spends the evening of July 4, 2026, with U.S. ambassador Brian Burch and his family, where they discussed peace and freedom, and the Burch family presented the pope with a U.S.A. World Cup jersey, a baseball and an apple pie. (OSV News photo/courtesy U.S. Embassy to the Holy See)

After spending the morning praying for migrants on the island of Lampedusa, Italy, Pope Leo XIV celebrated the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence with the U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See and his family.

“I am deeply honored to celebrate this special day with a fellow American and the Bishop of Rome,” Ambassador Brian Burch said, in a post on X.

Further posts on X said that the ambassador and Pope Leo “discussed President Trump’s bold leadership and American efforts to pursue peace, religious freedom, and the need for moral clarity and courage around the world.”

They also indicated that Pope Leo had received “a USA World Cup jersey, a commemorative Freedom 250 baseball, and a homemade apple pie” from the Burch family, the post said.

In a message to journalists, the Holy See Press Office July 4 confirmed the visit, saying, “welcoming an invitation from the U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See, the Holy Father visited the ambassador’s residence on the evening of Saturday, July 4, on the occasion of the national holiday.”

The post thread added that Pope Leo had confirmed during the visit that he is rooting for Team USA in the World Cup.

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Pope Leo XIV to receive 38th annual Liberty Medal on the eve of the 250th anniversary of the United States

 

Pope Leo XIVPope Leo XIV 

Pope Leo to receive Liberty Medal for promoting religious liberty

The US-based National Constitution Center announces it will award Pope Leo XIV with the 38th annual Liberty Medal on July 3, 2026, in an award ceremony on Independence Mall in Philadelphia.

Vatican News

On July 3, 2026, Pope Leo will receive the 38th annual Liberty Medal from the National Constitution Center, on the eve of the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States.

“The award recognizes the Holy Father’s lifelong work promoting religious liberty and freedom of conscience and expression around the world, ideals enshrined by America’s founders in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,” said the National Constitution Center in a statement.  

The ceremony will take place outside the Center on Independence Mall in Philadelphia, and the Pope intends to deliver live acceptance remarks virtually from the Vatican through a livestream.

The Director of the Holy See Press Office, Matteo Bruni, said the Pope “is deeply grateful to the National Constitution Centre for this prestigious award, in such a meaningful anniversary for the American People, as they are called to reflect on the 250 years of their history, holding the Declaration of Independence, Constitution of the United States, and Liberty as hallmarks of their heritage for future generations.”

The event is expected to bring together civic and faith leaders and members of the public to consider how America’s founding ideals articulated 250 years ago continue to resonate in a global context today.

Pope Leo XIV’s commitment to dialogue

In the statement, the National Constitution Center highlighted that since his election in May 2025, the Pope “has made interfaith and ecumenical dialogue a defining priority of his pontificate, engaging leaders from Jewish, Muslim, Christian, and other religious communities to promote mutual respect and peaceful coexistence.” 

“His outreach reflects a broader moral vision that frames religious liberty not as an abstract right, but as a lived expression of human dignity, particularly for marginalized communities, including religious minorities and those affected by conflict,” the statement continued.

National Constitution Center Interim President and CEO, Vince Stango, underlined that “the NCC is honored to award the Liberty Medal to Pope Leo XIV for his career as a consistent advocate for religious liberty, freedom of conscience, and human dignity.”

“In formal Vatican statements and public addresses," he continued, "His Holiness has affirmed that peace cannot exist without freedom of religion, freedom of thought, and freedom of expression, principles that closely align with constitutional protections guaranteed by the First Amendment.”

Liberty Medal and the National Constitution Center

The Liberty Medal, established in 1988 and hosted by the National Constitution Center since 2006, recognizes individuals and organizations who strive to secure the blessings of liberty to people around the globe.

This year’s award ceremony, held in celebration of the nation’s 250th anniversary and semiquincentennial, is presented in partnership with the City of Philadelphia and Wawa Welcome America as part of the city’s Independence Week events celebrating the semiquincentennial of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

Villanova University, Pope Leo XIV’s alma mater, also played a role in shaping this year’s Liberty Medal program.  

The National Constitution Center in Philadelphia brings together people of all ages and perspectives, across America and around the world, to learn about, debate, and celebrate the greatest vision of human freedom in history, the U.S. Constitution, according to the Center's website.

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

Trump administration and DOJ going to bat for Catholic priests vs. the unholy state of Washington

 

'Will not sit idly by': DOJ sues to prevent Catholic priests from violating secrecy of confessional by having to report child abuse


President Donald Trump speaks as Attorney General Pam Bondi listens during a meeting with the Fraternal Order of Police in the State Dinning Room of the White House, Thursday, June 5, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).


The Trump administration and the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice are going to bat for Catholic priests, the sacrament of penance, and the seal of confession, claiming in a lawsuit against the state of Washington that newly signed mandatory reporting legislation amounts to an attack on the First Amendment and the free exercise of religion.


The DOJ said Monday that it's suing in order to intervene and protect Catholic priests from having to choose between excommunication from the church — if they were to speak of a given confession — or facing potential prosecution by the state, if they did not comply with child abuse and neglect reporting mandates.

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

The lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington asserts that SB 5375, set to take effect as of July 27, violates the First and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution by purporting to compel clerics to report child abuse or neglect and thereby override their sincere religious beliefs.

Under the law, when "any member of the clergy … has reasonable cause to believe that a child has suffered abuse or neglect, he or she shall report such incident, or cause a report to be made, to the proper law enforcement agency," the law says. The duty to report already exists for others in positions of responsibility outside the context of religion, including law enforcement officers, psychologists, nurses, and childcare providers.

A key distinction, however, is that confidentiality of the confessional is nonnegotiable under canon law, and the breaking of that seal is punishable by excommunication — being cut off from the church.

"By design, SB 5375 directly interferes with and substantially burdens this sacred rite. It adds 'any member of the clergy,' which expressly includes Catholic priests, as individuals who must report information relating to suspected child abuse or neglect to state officials or law enforcement," the DOJ filing said. "The failure to do so subjects priests to criminal penalties and civil liability."

"Although Washington, like every other state, recognizes a privilege for Confession and other confidential religious communications, SB 5375 strips Catholic priests of their ability to rely on this or any other legal privilege as a defense to reporting suspected abuse or neglect," the suit to intervene added. "Thus, to comply with SB 5375, Catholic priests must disclose information even when it has been obtained solely through the sacred rite of Confession."

The court documents note that the DOJ is not "challeng[ing] the inclusion of priests as mandatory reporters per se," but specifically any mandatory reporting of what is learned through the confessional.

In a statement on the DOJ's case, Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said SB 5375 and any other bills that "explicitly target religious practices such as the Sacrament of Confession in the Catholic Church have no place in our society."

"Senate Bill 5375 unconstitutionally forces Catholic priests in Washington to choose between their obligations to the Catholic Church and their penitents or face criminal consequences, while treating the priest-penitent privilege differently than other well-settled privileges," Dhillon added. "The Justice Department will not sit idly by when States mount attacks on the free exercise of religion."

Monday, June 23, 2025

The focus for the 2025 Religious Freedom Week

 

The logo for Religious Freedom Week The logo for Religious Freedom Week  

Bishop Rhoades highlights religious freedom concerns

Bishop Kevin Rhoades, chairman of the USCCB’s Committee on Religious Liberty, highlights the domestic and international issues the Church in the United States is focusing on during Religious Freedom Week 2025.

By Christopher Wells and Kielce Gussie

Religious Freedom Week in the United States commenced on Sunday with a focus on political polarization, which can lead to “abandoning the search for truth and fidelity to the Church in order to support one or another political party or ideology.”

Polarization is an issue of special concern for the US Bishops, and for the Church, said Bishop Kevin Rhoades, especially when “people are more influenced by their political ideology than their faith.”

Challenges from across the ideological spectrum

Speaking with Vatican News ahead of Religious Freedom Week, Bishop Rhoades, the chairman of the USCCB’s Committee on Religious Liberty, noted that threats to religious freedom can come from various points of the political spectrum, with political parties on both the right and the left attempting to limit the religious freedom of their ideological opponents.

Each day of the week is dedicated to a different issue related to religious liberty, Bishop Rhoades said, noting that although the focus is largely on issues facing the United States, the week also has an international dimension—this year focusing on challenges to religious freedom in Nigeria and Nicaragua.

'We don't look at immigration status'

Among the domestic issues raised by the US Bishops is the Catholic Church’s services to migrants and refugees. “This doesn’t mean that we’re getting involved in the immigration debate itself,” said Bishop Rhoades. Instead, “it has to do with our ability, our freedom, to provide food or to provide housing, to provide assistance to those who are in our county. We don’t look to see what their immigration status is.”

Attacks on the Church’s ability to provide aid to those in need, the Bishop said, are a “serious violation” of religious liberty.

Parents' rights in educating their children

Bishop Rhoades explained that the choice of issues to emphasize during Religious Freedom Week is largely based on the USCCB’s annual report on the state of religious liberty in the United States. Among the other challenges addressed this year are government funding for in vitro fertilization and other procedures that fail to uphold the dignity of human life and parental choice in the education of their children.

The latter “is another area that we have worked very hard on,” Bishop Rhoades said, “because of the Church’s teaching and our belief that education is primarily the responsibility of the parents.”

Parents, he said, “should have the freedom to educate their children in schools that they choose, including religious schools, but sometimes we’re discriminated against because of that.” He described discrimination against religious schools as “unjust.”

Inspired by the Saints

In concluding remarks, Bishop Rhoades noted that Religious Freedom Week begins each year on the feast of Sts. Thomas More and John Fisher, who both suffered for their liberty and were martyred for their refusal to recognize the king of England as the supreme head of the Church in England. Although they truly loved their country, he said, “their ultimate loyalty was to Christ and His Kingdom.”

Similarly, Sts. Peter and Paul, whose feast marks the end of Religious Freedom Week, were “persecuted, imprisoned, and martyred in Rome” when they refused to deny their faith. So, Bishop Rhoades said, “I think the bookends for Religious Freedom Week, these two feasts, are also very significant for us” and an inspiration for those working to defend religious liberty.