Showing posts with label Brett Kavanaugh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brett Kavanaugh. Show all posts

Thursday, July 12, 2018

Yep, this is the kind of man to hate; nope, this SCOTUS nominee spends Wednesday night feeding the hungry; and it's not a mere photo op

What Kavanaugh Was Secretly Caught Doing Hours After Trump’s Nomination Will Silence The Critics



Kevin Daley | Supreme Court Reporter


President Donald Trump nominated Judge Brett Kavanaugh for the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday night.
Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh speaks in the East Room of the White House in Washington, U.S., July 9, 2018. REUTERS/Jim Bourg
Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh speaks in the East Room of the White House in Washington, U.S., July 9, 2018. REUTERS/Jim Bourg
His nomination has set off a generational fight over the future of the high court. Interest groups and grassroots organizers plan to make his confirmation the marquee fight of the Trump presidency.
Anti-Kavanaugh protestors outside the US Supreme Court. (YouTube screenshot/Washington Post)
Anti-Kavanaugh protestors outside the U.S. Supreme Court. (YouTube screenshot/Washington Post)
Democrats are already promising all out resistance.
The judge has spent the last two days meeting with senior lawmakers on Capitol Hill, ahead of his confirmation hearings. In the coming weeks, he will meet with dozens of senators.
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell greets Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh and Vice Preisdent Mike Pence for a meeting in his office at the U.S. Capitol on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., July 10, 2018. REUTERS/Leah Millis
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell greets Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh and Vice Preisdent Mike Pence for a meeting in his office at the U.S. Capitol on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., July 10, 2018. REUTERS/Leah Millis
But amidst the chaos of the confirmation fight, Kavanaugh took a moment to do something incredibly human.
A passerby spotted the new Supreme Court nominee on her way home from work Wednesday night, and sent these pictures to The Daily Caller News Foundation. Kavanaugh was serving meals to the homeless outside Catholic Charities in downtown Washington, less than 48 hours after he was tapped to succeed Justice Anthony Kennedy.
Judge Kavanaugh chatting with fellow volunteers. (DCNF)
Judge Kavanaugh is chatting with fellow volunteers. (TheDCNF)
According to his D.C. Circuit biography, the judge is a volunteer with the St. Maria’s Meals program, which serves hot dinners to the capital’s poor. During his acceptance remarks on Monday night, the judge mentioned that his Jesuit high school education taught him to be “a man for others.”
Judge Brett Kavanaugh serving meals to the homeless (DCNF)
Judge Brett Kavanaugh is serving meals to the homeless. (TheDCNF)
A fellow volunteer confirmed that the judge signed up for the event some time ago and chose to keep the date, developments in his professional life notwithstanding.
Really classy move, Your Honor.

Tuesday, July 10, 2018

Crux opinion piece on nomination of Brett Kavanaugh

Catholics don’t see sweeping legal change with Trump’s SCOTUS pick


Catholics don’t see sweeping legal change with Trump’s SCOTUS pick

(Credit: AP.)

NEW YORK - Despite the fact that a new member of the Supreme Court could shape judicial precedent for decades to come, a number of Catholic legal experts say that with Monday’s pick of Circuit Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh, expectations of sweeping and immediate legal change on neuralgic issues such as abortion and gay marriage are premature.
If confirmed by the U.S. Senate, Kavanaugh will replace outgoing Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy who, after serving more than 30 years on the Court, announced his retirement on June 27 at the end of this year’s term. Kavanaugh previously served as a clerk for Kennedy.
During an announcement in the East Room of the White House, Trump praised Kavanaugh as “one of the finest legal minds of our time,” adding that “no one in America is more qualified for this position and no one more deserving.”
Although Kavanaugh’s appointment is expected to tilt the Court in a more conservative direction, according to Marc DeGirolami, a professor of law and associate director of the Center for Law and Religion at St. John’s University, pro-lifers hoping for an eventual reversal of Roe v. Wade shouldn’t get their hopes up.
“It doesn’t work that way institutionally on the court, and it doesn’t work that way culturally,” DeGirolami told Crux.
Michael Moreland, University Professor of Law and Religion and Director of the Eleanor H. McCullen Center for Law, Religion and Public Policy at Villanova University echoed those sentiments, adding, “the Supreme Court often doesn’t want to take on bigger issues than are necessary to resolve the case in front of them.”
Instead, both said that on issues such as abortion, Kavanaugh would likely be open to ruling in favor of challenges to existing law that could slowly chip away at current laws, rather than completely overturning it.
During his remarks following the president’s introduction, Kavanaugh specifically highlighted his Catholic faith, noting that he is part of a “vibrant Catholic community” in Washington, D.C., where he attends Blessed Sacrament parish in Chevy Chase.
He went on to cite his education at Georgetown Preparatory School - an elite Jesuit school - and its motto to be “Men for Others.” Coincidentally, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch also attended the same Catholic high school, where the two briefly overlapped.
In May, Kavanaugh delivered the commencement address at the Catholic University of America Law School, where he made reference to both Pope John Paul II and Pope Francis, telling graduates that their faith means more than merely attending Mass but also helping others in need.
At 53 years old, Kavanaugh could become one of the youngest members of the Court, though he is expected to face a contentious confirmation battle, with many Democratic Senators warning they will forcefully resist his nomination, having hoped the president would wait until after the midterm elections this November to name a replacement.
Even so, Senator Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has vowed a swift confirmation process this fall. To do so, he will have to navigate politically treacherous territory, given that his Republican majority is down one vote while Arizona Senator John McCain remains at home fighting brain cancer.
Other members of his party, notably Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine have voiced opposition to a nominee who would threaten abortion rights.
A simple majority vote is needed to confirm the nominee, and if confirmed, Kavanaugh will mark Trump’s second selection to the high court. In April of last year, Gorsuch was sworn to the bench to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia who died in 2016.
According to Rick Garnett, an associate dean and professor of law at Notre Dame Law School, Kavanaugh’s legal thinking is “shaped by Scalia,” as he believes is the case for all of the potential contenders on the president’s shortlist.
The opportunity to fill a vacant Court seat became one of the defining issues during the 2016 presidential campaign, when then-candidate Trump pledged he would make his Supreme Court nominations from a list of 25 names, all of which had been vetted by leading conservative judicial groups with the aim of fulfilling Trump’s campaign goal of overturning Roe.
Among the current justices on the court, five are Roman Catholic - Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, Sonia Sotomayor, and Clarence Thomas. While Gorusch was raised Catholic, he now attends an Episcopal congregation.
Retiring at 81 years old, Kennedy cast critical votes in some of the court’s most consequential cases for Catholics, including abortion, gay marriage, capital punishment, school choice, and on labor unions.
In 1992, he co-authored the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey upholding abortion rights established in Roe v. Wade, while also allowing for some restrictions to be established. In 2005, in Roper v. Simmons, Kennedy cast the deciding vote in a decision that prohibited juveniles from being criminally executed.
However, he is most likely to be remembered for writing the majority opinion in the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges, which established a new civil right to same-sex marriage.
In reflecting on the Kennedy legacy, Garnett told Crux that “Catholics, like everybody, should admire Kennedy as a real decent gentleman.”
He went on to add that Kennedy’s legacy on freedom of speech should be at the top of the list for things which Catholics should remember Kennedy, along with his “consistent and correct” support of school voucher programs and his position that “there is nothing unconstitutional with government cooperating with private institutions for public purposes.”
Yet on the issue of abortion, Garnett said the manner in which Kennedy continued to support the Court’s decision in Roe was “unfortunate.” He also added that his decision in Obergefell “moved the law away from the Catholic understanding of what marriage is.”
Surveying those changes, legal scholar and president of the Catholic University of America, John Garvey, told Crux that “there are a number of issues that have opened up between the Church and where the culture is going and a lot of people are hoping future rulings [by the court] will change that.”
As evidence of the high stakes prospects of Kavanaugh’s nomination, a number of outside conservative Catholic legal giants were on hand for the White House ceremony, including Ed Whelan, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, and Leonard Leo, executive vice president of the Federalist Society and the individual largely responsible for vetting the president’s shortlist of potential nominees.
Monsignor John Enzler, head of Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., where Kavanugh serves as a volunteer, also attended as a special guest of the judge. When Pope Francis visited the nation’s capital in 2015, the pope paid a visit to Enzler’s ministry headquarters where the two led an outreach to feed lunch to homeless individuals.
On Tuesday, Kavanaugh will begin the process of meeting with individual senators before confirmation hearings begin later this fall.
Moreland told Crux that he believes Kavanaugh is “the best combination of the strongest pick and the safest pick the president could make,” noting that while his specific opinions on abortion law are unknown, he has already revealed himself to be a “strong defender” of religious freedom based on previous decisions.
Although many Catholics view this as a turning point for the Court on issues related to matters of human life and religious liberty, Garvey told Crux that those on “both sides” of the abortion issue have, perhaps, put too much faith in the role of the court to deliver the “right outcome” of certain cases, while neglecting other areas of government or cultural influence.
Garvey is quick to note that that he favors “a strong commitment to the text of the Constitution,” yet at the same time he cautions against an overly active judiciary.
“That’s not the business of the court,” said Garvey, “and it’s bad for the democratic process.”

Monday, July 9, 2018

It's Catholic Kavanaugh for Supreme Court

President Donald Trump Nominates Pro-Life-Friendly Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

National   Steven Ertelt   Jul 9, 2018   |   8:59PM    Washington, DC

President Donald Trump tonight has nominated pro-life friendly federal appeals court Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh has taken the pro-life side in important cases and has very strong pro-life Bona fides — prompting one leading pro-life attorney to say he would be an excellent addition to the Supreme Court.
Kavanaugh sits on the DC Circuit Court. That is the main federal appeals court — often considered a stepping stone to the Supreme Court as it hears some of the most prominent cases, including ones filed against federal legislation like Obamacare. So it’s not a huge surprise President Trump selected a member from it.
Kavanaugh worked as associate counsel to pro-life President George W. Bush and he came out of the era of Reagan judicial appointees. His rulings have been said to be more like Scalia than Kennedy, however.
Sarah Pitlyk, a former law clerk to Judge Kavanaugh and special counsel for the Thomas More Society, which is a leading pro-life legal group, says Kavanaugh has an excellent record and perhaps the best record of any of the finalists president Trump is considering. As she writes:
On the vital issues of protecting religious liberty and enforcing restrictions on abortion, no court-of-appeals judge in the nation has a stronger, more consistent record than Judge Brett Kavanaugh. On these issues, as on so many others, he has fought for his principles and stood firm against pressure. He would do the same on the Supreme Court.
The pro-life attorney is not the only Kavanaugh fan. As Newsmax reports, Ed Meese is a huge supporter.
Ed Meese, President Reagan’s Attorney General and one of his closest associates, has known Kavanaugh for decades and confirmed he has been a solid Reaganite as a judge.
“I know Brett Kavanaugh reasonably well and think highly of him,” Meese told Newsmax.
“He is a very able guy, an originalist who is faithful to the Constitution and believes in it.”
So where does Kavanaugh come down on pro-life issues that affect the yard before his court? In her profile, Pitlyk mentioned three cases where Judge Kavanaugh came down on the pro-life side:
Take another case that arose this year before the D.C. Circuit, Garza v. Hargan. The American Civil Liberties Union sued the Department of Health and Human Services for declining to facilitate an immediate abortion for an unlawful-immigrant minor in federal custody. The district court ruled for the ACLU. On appeal, Judge Kavanaugh and another judge reversed, agreeing with the Trump administration that it did not have to provide an immediate abortion and ordering the district court to give the minor time to find a sponsor so that the government did not have to facilitate the abortion — precisely the relief the administration sought.
When the full D.C. Circuit later vacated that decision and ordered the government to facilitate the abortion immediately, Judge Kavanaugh dissented, stating that the majority had “badly erred” in adopting a “radical extension of the Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence.” He again endorsed the Trump administration’s position that it did not have to facilitate an immediate abortion on demand. In his opinion, Judge Kavanaugh emphasized the government’s “permissible interests” in “favoring fetal life” and “refraining from facilitating abortion.”
Judge Kavanaugh also ruled against the Obama HHS mandate that forced Hobby Lobby, Little Sisters of the Poor and other Christian-run businesses and organizations to fund abortion drugs in their employee health care plans.
During the Obama administration, he voted in Priests for Life v. HHS to invalidate the so-called accommodation to the contraceptive mandate, which required religious organizations to sign a form facilitating access to contraceptives for their employees. Judge Kavanaugh was one of few federal judges (Neil Gorsuch was another) to hold that the law imposed a “substantial burden” on the organizations’ exercise of religious liberty, and one of even fewer to conclude that the contraceptive-mandate accommodation violated the law. The Supreme Court later vindicated his position by vacating decisions that upheld the contraceptive-mandate accommodation.
Judge Kavanaugh ruled in favor of Priests for Life, concluding that the Obamacare contraceptive-mandate accommodation violated their religious liberty — another conservative legal ruling that for social conservatives should only build confidence in his judicial philosophy.
Judge Kavanaugh dissented from a court-of-appeals decision upholding Obamacare. He called the individual mandate “unprecedented on the federal level in American history” and said that upholding it would “usher in a significant expansion of congressional authority with no obvious principled limit.” He also explained that “no court to reach the merits has accepted the Government’s Taxing clause argument” and that the taxing clause “has not traditionally authorized a legal prohibition or mandate.”
And Judge Kavanaugh recently upheld pro-life free speech.
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (i.e., the Metro) bans “issue-oriented advertising,” which it interprets to include religious ads. So when the Catholic Archdiocese of Washington wanted to run an ad with the words “Find the Perfect Gift” and an image of shepherds following a star in the sky during the Christmas season, Metro vetoed the ad. The archdiocese sued Metro for violating the First Amendment speech and religion clauses, as well as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The district court ruled for Metro, and the archdiocese appealed to the D.C. Circuit, where the oral argument pitted Paul Clement (representing the archdiocese), a solicitor general in the George W. Bush administration, against Donald Verrilli (representing the Metro), a solicitor general under Obama. Kavanaugh hammered Verrilli with what the Washington Post called “unrelenting” questioning about the Christmas-ad ban, which the judge described as “pure discrimination” and “odious to the Constitution.”
As Pitlyk concludes: “In short, Judge Kavanaugh’s record on issues of concern to social conservatives is rock solid, and it far exceeds that of any other contender. He is the right person for this pivotal time.”